Refused countries counted
Nine of the ten print a list of places they refuse, and no two agree
Nine operators publish something about refused countries, yet only eight lists can be read end to end; this page counts those names and weighs what a long list proves.
| Casino | Check threshold in the terms | Withdrawal cap | Licence | Coins listed | Go |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vavepaid placement | case by case | from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 90 | Visit |
| Rocketpot | US$2,500 | 5,000 USD per month cl. 11.5 | Curacao | 13 | The clauses |
| Bitcasino.io | 2,500 EUR | 1,000,000 USDT per week cl. 6.10 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | not read | The clauses |
| Wild Fortune | case by case | 15,000 EUR per month cl. 11.8 | Anjouan Gaming Board | 10 | The clauses |
| DuckDice | case by case | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | 10 | The clauses |
| Empire.io | 2,000 USDT | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | not read | The clauses |
| Metaspins | case by case | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 8 | The clauses |
| Oshi Casino | case by case | 4,000 EUR per day cl. 12 | Anjouan Gaming Board | 10 | The clauses |
| PlayAmo | case by case | 7,500 EUR per week cl. 12 | Anjouan Gaming Board | 7 | The clauses |
| Rainbet | case by case | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | 9 | The clauses |
The lists as printed
This page counts the refused-country lists in the terms of ten crypto casino operators. Nine publish something that can be called a list. Eight of those lists are fully readable, from first name to last. The ninth, at Bitcasino.io, names Japan but points elsewhere for the full list, so that list is recorded here as not read. The tenth operator, Vave, which is the paid placement on this site, has no list on file at all.
The eight readable totals are Oshi Casino 224, PlayAmo 217, Metaspins 58, Wild Fortune 47, Rocketpot 34, DuckDice 16, Empire.io 12 and Rainbet 11. The distance from 224 to 11 is large, but the figure measures the number of names an operator decided to print, not the number of countries it refuses. A long list and a short list can describe the same reality with different degrees of detail.
The counting rule used on this page matters because list totals are sensitive. Names that differ only in punctuation or spelling are counted once. Where an operator names a country and one of its territories separately, that is counted as two names, because the document wrote two. The rules behind every count on this site are on the method page, and all ten clauses were read on 26 August 2026.
Length is not a policy
The strongest evidence that list length is not the same as strictness sits inside one company. Oshi Casino and PlayAmo are both run by Novatrix SRL under the same Anjouan licence, ALSI-202508056-FI2. The two brands sit in the same operation, and were both read on the same date. If a refused-country list expressed a single policy, the two lists would match.
They do not. Oshi names 224 places and PlayAmo names 217. The two lists share 213 names. Eleven names are printed only by Oshi and four only by PlayAmo, leaving a fifteen-name gap between two documents carrying the same licence number. The ownership link itself is examined on who owns what, but the arithmetic here already shows that editorial differences can alter a list without altering the operator.
It is tempting to read Oshi's longer list as proof that Oshi refuses more places than PlayAmo does. The safer reading is that Oshi's terms are more detailed. Both documents were produced by the same registered company under the same licence, and the fifteen missing names are better explained as drafting choices than as a genuine difference in who may play. The terms pages do not provide any further evidence.
Two names on every list
Across the eight readable lists, exactly two places appear on all eight: the United Kingdom and the United States. No other place has that coverage. The Netherlands appears on seven lists. Curacao, Spain, France, Iraq, North Korea, Ukraine and Yemen appear on six lists each. These are not border cases; they are the ordinary jurisdictions that the operators agree on.
The eight lists name 234 distinct places in total. That total is higher than any single list, because the lists disagree in detail. A place can be refused in one casino's document and absent from another's. Absence is not acceptance, but it is also not proof of refusal. The document is simply silent.
Anyone hoping for one crypto casino restricted countries list, good across the market, is looking for a document that does not exist. Two of the 234 named places are common to every readable list. The other 232 are missing from at least one of the eight, which means a reader who cares about a particular place has to open a particular operator's terms rather than a summary. Where in each document that clause is filed, and how far it sits from the cashier section, is recorded in where the clause lives.
Thirteen names, one operator each
At the opposite end of the overlap, thirteen places are named by exactly one of the eight operators. This page does not list them, because the source documents can move and the count is the stable fact. What the thirteen show is that the eight terms pages were written individually.
A short list is not the same as a narrow list. Rainbet prints eleven places, Empire.io prints twelve and DuckDice prints sixteen. A reader asking which countries no-verification casinos refuse may be tempted to treat Rainbet as accepting every unlisted country. The document does not say that. It names the places it names and leaves the rest unwritten.
The same caution applies to Oshi and PlayAmo. The shorter of those two lists is not necessarily the less restrictive. It is simply the less detailed. List length is a property of a sentence in a terms page, not a property of a border. Counting 224 against 217 tells you what the author typed, not what the operator will enforce.
Two rows that are not counts
Bitcasino.io is the only operator whose terms page links to a full refused-country list without supplying that list on the page read. Its terms name Japan explicitly and then direct the reader elsewhere. That full list was not read. Not read is recorded as not read. It is not the same as a short list, and it is not a permission.
Vave has no list on file at all. Vave is the paid placement on this site and is marked as one wherever it appears. An absent list cannot be compared with a printed list, so Vave occupies a separate row. An absence says only that no document was found; it does not say what the operator does when a player registers from any particular place.
Assembling a country list out of these ten documents forces a decision about the two rows that produced no text, and the honest one is to mark them unread and missing rather than fold them into a total. That is what this page does, and it is the reason the headline total is 234 distinct places across eight readable lists, not across ten.
When a list is a sample
Rocketpot's own terms do not present their restricted jurisdictions as a closed set. They name a restricted jurisdiction "such as" the places that follow. Wolf.bet, an operator in the wider library rather than in the ten here, uses "including but not limited to" in the same position. A clause introduced that way gives examples and leaves the perimeter open: the list is a sample, not a boundary, and no arithmetic performed on it can close it.
This qualification changes how the counts should be read. Rocketpot's 34 names are the ones that happen to be printed; the operator's wording allows for others. The same holds wherever that wording appears. Each of the eight readable lists is a snapshot of what one operator printed on one day, and 26 August 2026 is that day.
A name on a list does not commit an operator to a permanent border. Country clauses are rewritten as operators change licences, owners or risk appetite, and a list that is complete this summer may be shorter or longer next year. The page therefore describes documents, not policies. The Oshi and PlayAmo gap is itself a reminder that two lists issued from the same licence can be reconciled by a future edit. The numbers themselves, and what each returns when it is looked up, are handled separately on the licences page.