Method
Where every figure on this site comes from
One source counts here: the document the operator publishes itself, plus the register entry for the licence it claims. Every figure carries its clause number so the copying can be checked, and everything that was not read is marked as not read.
| Casino | Check threshold in the terms | Withdrawal cap | Licence | Coins listed | Go |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vavepaid placement | not published | not published | not published | not published | Visit |
| Rocketpot | $2,500 | 5,000 USD per month cl. 11.5 | Curacao | 13 | |
| Bitcasino.io | 2,500 EUR | 1,000,000 USDT per week cl. 6.10 | Curaçao Gaming Authority | not published | |
| Wild Fortune | not published | 15,000 EUR per month cl. 11.8 | Anjouan Gaming Board | 10 | |
| DuckDice | not published | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | 10 | |
| Empire.io | 2,000 USDT | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | not published | |
| Metaspins | not published | not published | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 8 | |
| Oshi Casino | not published | 4,000 EUR per day cl. 12 | Anjouan Gaming Board | 10 | |
| PlayAmo | not published | 7,500 EUR per week cl. 12 | Anjouan Gaming Board | 7 | |
| Rainbet | not published | not published | Anjouan Gaming Board | 9 |
One source: the operator's own document
Everything on this site about verification rules, withdrawal caps and coin lists was copied from the operator's published terms. Everything about licences was taken from the licence claim in those terms and checked against the issuing authority's public register. Those are the only two kinds of source used.
What does not count as a source: other comparison sites, forum threads, review portals, affiliate summaries, and the operator's own promotional copy outside its terms. This is not snobbery about second-hand information. It is a practical rule about provenance. A figure passed from one page to the next loses its origin in two hops, and after that nobody can say whether it was ever in a clause. The recurring example in this industry is a confident verification threshold quoted for an operator whose terms contain nothing but a discretionary sentence — the number is not a lie anyone told deliberately, it is a number that was copied until it looked like a fact.
Because of that rule, every figure here is printed with the clause it came from. Clause 6.6, clause 11.4, clause 5.4, clause 6.10, clause 11.8, clause 11.5, clause 12. Those numbers are not decoration and they are not authority-signalling. They are the instruction for checking the copying.
Ten operators, three states of reading
All ten operators in this set were read on 26 August 2026, and the reading came out in three different states, which are recorded rather than smoothed over.
Read from a live document — six operators. Rocketpot, Bitcasino.io, Wild Fortune, DuckDice, Metaspins and Rainbet. The terms page was reachable and current when read.
Read from an archived copy — three operators. Empire.io, Oshi Casino and PlayAmo. The clause and the figure are what the captured document said at the time of capture. That is a weaker source than a live page, it is marked as such, and a reader relying on any of those three figures should open the operator's current terms before acting on it.
Not read at all — one operator. Vave, which is the paid partner of this site. No readable terms page was obtained, so there is no verification clause, no cap, no coin count, no company name and no licence number recorded for it. Its row in the table is the emptiest one on the page.
Empty means read and not found
An empty cell on this site means one thing: the operator publishes nothing on that point that we could read. It never means zero. It never means unlimited. It never means the industry-typical value.
This is the rule the whole site rests on, and its opposite is far more comfortable. A column where nine cells are filled looks like work; a column where five are empty looks like a gap in the research. In fact the second is the more accurate object, because the emptiness is the finding. Five of ten operators publishing no withdrawal cap is a result about the market, and replacing it with five plausible numbers would convert a result into decoration.
Two consequences follow, and both are load-bearing.
A missing coin count is not a casino that takes no coins. Vave, Bitcasino.io and Empire.io publish no count we could read, and printing a zero in that column would be the single strongest false claim the table is capable of making.
A missing cap is not an absence of limits. An operator that has not published a ceiling has not committed to there not being one.
A threshold and a discretionary clause are different objects
The verification column distinguishes two things that are frequently merged, and the distinction is the reason this site exists.
A threshold is an amount in a currency, in a clause. Three operators have one: Rocketpot 2,500 USD in 11.4, Bitcasino.io 2,500 EUR in 6.6, Empire.io 2,000 USDT in 5.4.
A risk-based clause is wording that lets the operator require documents when its own assessment calls for it. Six operators have that: Wild Fortune 18.1, DuckDice Section 2, Metaspins 9.7, Oshi Casino 12, PlayAmo 12, Rainbet 5.2 and 8.3.
The second is not the first with the number withheld. It is the statement that no number was agreed. So a discretionary clause is never converted into a figure here, never averaged with the three real figures, and never described as around anything.
No conversions, no estimates, no stopwatches
Three published thresholds arrive in three currencies and five published caps arrive in three currencies. None of them is converted into a common unit on this site. A converted figure appears in no operator's terms; it depends on a rate and a date that are not in the clause, and it breaks the promise that the number beside a clause reference is the number in the document.
There are no timing figures anywhere on this site — no minutes, no average payout speeds, no queue lengths. Those can only come from depositing, playing and withdrawing with real money, and this site does none of those things. There is no account at any of the ten operators listed. Nothing here rests on play, and any page on this site that appeared to describe how a withdrawal felt would be a page that had abandoned its own method.
Licences: verified means numbered
A licence is called verified only where there is a number, because the number is what can be matched against the issuing authority's register. Nine of the ten have one: six from the Anjouan Gaming Board, two from the Curaçao Gaming Authority in the current OGL format, and one older-format Curaçao number at Rocketpot.
An operator naming a jurisdiction without a number would be recorded as unverified — a claim not yet checkable, rather than a claim disproved. Vave names neither, and is recorded as unverified with a not-published cell.
Register status is treated as a snapshot with a date attached, not a permanent property. Eight entries carried a status when read; Rocketpot's carried none, so none is printed. Anyone making a money decision on a licence should check the register directly, because it is more current than this page can be.
The paid link, stated once and plainly
Vave is the commercial partner of this site. The link to Vave is a paid advertising link, it is marked as advertising, and it is the way this site is funded.
What that buys is placement. It does not buy a filled-in cell, a softened sentence, or an exemption from any rule on this page — and the proof is visible rather than promised: Vave has the emptiest row in the table, no licence number, no verification clause and no cap, and every one of those absences is printed in the same words used for the other nine. Had the empty-cell rule been bent anywhere, that is the row where it would have happened.
Who writes this site and on what basis is set out under about this site.