A jurisdiction is a claim. A number is something you can look up.

Two brands sharing one number

Read the Anjouan list again and one entry appears twice. Oshi Casino and PlayAmo carry the same licence number, ALSI-202508056-FI2, and the same company, Novatrix SRL.

That is not an error in the table and it is not unusual in this industry — a single licence commonly covers several brands operated by the same company. It is worth noticing anyway, because it changes what a reader is doing when they compare those two rows. They are not comparing two independent houses with two independent compliance functions. They are comparing two front ends behind one permission. Where that leads, and what else in the table it explains, is set out under one company, several brands.

What an offshore licence is not

This part needs stating without hedging, because the presence of a licence number tends to reassure more than it should.

An Anjouan or Curaçao licence is not equivalent to a licence issued by the gambling regulator of the country you live in. The supervisory intensity, the dispute-resolution machinery and the funds-protection requirements are different, and the practical route available to a player who has a complaint is different. A number in an offshore register tells you that a permission exists and can be located. It does not tell you what happens when something goes wrong.

Nor does an operator's licence say anything about whether you may lawfully use the service where you are. Those are two separate legal questions decided by two separate bodies of law, and only one of them is answered by the register. The second one is the reader's to resolve, and this site is not the place to resolve it — nothing here is legal advice and nothing here should be read as encouragement to use a service that is not open to you.

What a number does buy is checkability. Given the number, the authority's own register is the source, and it outranks any statement on the operator's site, any badge, and any comparison table including this one.

What a status field does and does not mean

Eight of the nine numbered licences carried a status when the entry was read: six recorded as valid at Anjouan, two recorded as active at the Curaçao Gaming Authority. Rocketpot's entry carried no status we could read, so its status cell is empty rather than assumed.

A status is a snapshot. Register entries change, licences lapse, are surrendered or are suspended, and an entry read on one date is evidence about that date and not about today. Every operator in this set was checked on 26 August 2026, and that date is part of the fact rather than a footnote to it. If you are relying on a licence status for a decision involving real money, the register is a one-minute check and it is more current than anything published here.

The same caution applies in the other direction. An empty status field on this page means the entry did not give us one — it is not a hint that something is wrong.

The blank row, again

Vave is the operator with no jurisdiction and no number, and Vave pays for placement on this site. Those two sentences belong next to each other, which is why they are in the same paragraph.

The row could have been filled in. A jurisdiction could have been inferred from a badge, a number could have been carried over from a competitor's table, or the cell could simply have been left visually softer than the others so it drew less attention. None of that happened, and the reason is not virtue — it is that a site whose entire value is nine checkable clause and licence numbers cannot afford one invented tenth. The empty cells on the partner's row are the evidence that the rule is a rule.

How sources are chosen, why an archived document is marked as archived, and what this site refuses to claim are set out under how the terms are read.