Bitcoin is in every coin list here, and in one check clause of ten

Eight of these ten operators publish a list of coins they take, and BTC is on all eight. Nine of the ten write the identity check against the account and the withdrawal rather than the coin. The tenth, Wild Fortune, blocks bitcoin deposits and bets until a document arrives, under clause 2.7.

The lynx doorkeeper holding a plain unmarked metal disc in one hand and an open document in the other

What ten operators write in their own terms about the identity check, the withdrawal cap and the licence they hold. Each figure carries the clause it was copied from. An empty cell means the operator publishes nothing we could read on that point — it is not a zero and it is not a permission.
Casino	Check threshold in the terms	Withdrawal cap	Licence	Coins listed	Go
Vavepaid placement	case by case	from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8	Curaçao Gaming Authority	90	Visit
Rocketpot	US$2,500	5,000 USD per month cl. 11.5	Curacao	13	The clauses
Bitcasino.io	2,500 EUR	1,000,000 USDT per week cl. 6.10	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	The clauses
Wild Fortune	case by case	15,000 EUR per month cl. 11.8	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	The clauses
DuckDice	case by case	not published	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	The clauses
Empire.io	2,000 USDT	not published	Anjouan Gaming Board	not read	The clauses
Metaspins	case by case	not published	Curaçao Gaming Authority	8	The clauses
Oshi Casino	case by case	4,000 EUR per day cl. 12	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	The clauses
PlayAmo	case by case	7,500 EUR per week cl. 12	Anjouan Gaming Board	7	The clauses
Rainbet	case by case	not published	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	The clauses

The narrowest word in the phrase

Of the words people type when they look for this, bitcoin is the most specific: 8 of the 10 operators here publish a list of coins, BTC sits on all eight, and the two blanks are not refusals but silences. The word is also the one that changes the least about what happens at the exit.

An identity check is attached to a person, an account and an amount. A coin is a rail. At nine of these ten, nothing in the terms makes the check conditional on which rail the money arrived on, and that absence is worth more than any of the individual coin lists.

The tenth is a correction to an earlier version of this page, which claimed the absence held across all ten. Wild Fortune clause 2.7 requires bitcoin players to submit an identity document before playing and blocks deposits and bets until they do — the only rule on this table that ties a check to a coin, and the only one that arrives before the first bet rather than at the payout. It is set out on the earliest gate.

Curacao Gaming Authority certificate of operation for bitcasino.io — The register names the company behind the brand: Moon Technologies B.V., company number 152185, licence OGL/2023/111/0069, granted 01/07/2024, status Active. A licence number is worth exactly this much — it resolves in the issuing register, or it does not resolve at all.

The lists, and what is in them

Vave publishes the widest list at 90 coins, with BTC, ETH and USDT at the front of it, followed by LTC, DOGE and TON. Rocketpot publishes 13. Wild Fortune, DuckDice and Oshi Casino each publish 10. Rainbet publishes 9, Metaspins 8, PlayAmo 7.

BTC is on every one of those eight lists. So, on all but one of them, is a stablecoin, and on most of them a litecoin or a dogecoin option as well. The lists are broadly the same shape, which is unsurprising: they are the coins with deposit tooling that works.

Bitcasino.io and Empire.io publish no coin list that could be read in the documents examined here. Their cells stay blank. A blank is not the claim that these two refuse bitcoin, which would be a strange thing for either to do, and it is not a claim that they accept it either.

Where the coin genuinely matters

Two places, and both are worth knowing.

The first is the unit a threshold is written in. Rocketpot writes 2,500 USD in clause 11.4. Bitcasino.io writes 2,500 EUR in clause 6.6. Empire.io writes 2,000 USDT in clause 5.4. Three numbers that look adjacent and are measured in three different things, one of which floats against the other two. A player holding a volatile coin can cross a threshold denominated in national currency without depositing another satoshi, purely because the market moved. The three figures and their clauses are set out in published thresholds.

The second is the ceiling. Every published withdrawal cap among these ten is written in EUR, USD or USDT rather than in BTC, which means a bitcoin balance is measured against the cap at whatever rate applies on the day. The caps themselves sit in withdrawal caps.

What none of them publishes

Nowhere in the ten documents read here is there a statement of which network a payout leaves on.

That gap matters more than it looks. Almost every speed claim made about bitcoin gambling depends on the network rather than the operator: a base-chain BTC withdrawal, a Lightning payment and a USDT transfer on a low-fee chain behave nothing alike on either timing or cost. Comparison pages routinely quote all three as though the operator had committed to one.

None of these ten has. So this site publishes no network claims, no fee figures and no confirmation-time estimates, and the reason is the same reason the payout windows are blank on nine rows: the document does not say. What the document does say about payout timing is gathered in instant withdrawal.

DuckDice responsible gambling policy, the underage and vulnerable-player sections — The underage section spells out the whole consequence: any account created by an underage person is permanently blocked, available winnings are forfeited, and the contact details attached to it go onto a black list. Age is not checked at sign-up here — it is settled afterwards, by confiscation.

The pseudonymity question, stated accurately

A public chain is a public ledger. Paying from it does not conceal a payment; it records the payment permanently in a place anyone can read, without a bank in the middle. The account at the other end holds deposit addresses, amounts, dates and play history from the first transaction onward, whether or not a document has ever been requested.

So the honest description of a BTC-funded account at one of these ten is an account whose real-world identity has not been asked for yet. The distance between that and anonymity is covered in what anonymous can mean.

The one-line version

Bitcoin decides how the money arrives. The clause decides whether it leaves. Reading the second one is the only part of this that pays.

Questions people actually type

Does depositing in bitcoin mean no documents will be requested?

At nine of the ten it does not. The three operators that publish a threshold write it as an amount, and the discretionary clauses are written against the withdrawal rather than the currency. Wild Fortune is the exception: clause 2.7 requires bitcoin players to supply an identity document before playing, and blocks deposits and bets until they do.

Which of these operators accept BTC?

Eight of the ten publish a coin list that we could read, and BTC appears on every one of them. Bitcasino.io and Empire.io publish no list we could read, so their coin cells are blank rather than empty of bitcoin.

Do any of them publish which network a withdrawal uses?

None of the ten states, in the documents read here, whether a bitcoin payout goes out on the base chain or over Lightning, or which network a USDT payout uses. Timing and fee claims that depend on the network are therefore unverified here.

Is a stablecoin treated differently from bitcoin?

Two of the three published thresholds are denominated in national currency and the third in USDT, so the unit a threshold is measured in varies. The clauses themselves do not treat one coin as exempt from the check.