Five caps, three different windows, and one number nobody should compare

Three currencies, and no conversion

The five caps arrive in three units: USDT, EUR and USD. This site does not convert them into a single currency, for the same reason it does not convert the three published verification thresholds.

A converted figure is a figure that appears in no operator's terms. It depends on an exchange rate and on the date that rate was taken, neither of which is in clause 6.10 or clause 11.8. The clause number next to a figure is a promise that you can open the document and find precisely that figure at precisely that place, and a conversion breaks the promise while looking more helpful than the original.

What survives without conversion is still worth having. Five operators have committed to a ceiling in writing; five have not. Among the five, the periods differ by a factor of thirty between the shortest and the longest window, which is a larger structural difference than any of the amounts.

What a cap actually does to a large win

For most accounts a withdrawal cap never comes up. For one good night it is the most consequential number in the document, and the effect is not a refusal — it is a schedule.

A cap does not usually mean the money above the line is lost. It means the same balance leaves in instalments across successive periods, and the length of the period sets how long that takes. This is where the day-week-month distinction stops being a technicality: a balance well above the ceiling clears in a very different number of calendar days under a daily cap than under a monthly one, even when the ceilings themselves are similar figures.

It is also where the cap and the verification clause meet. A withdrawal that is being paid in instalments is a withdrawal that stays in contact with the operator's compliance process for the whole of that schedule rather than for one afternoon. If the verification rule in the same document is discretionary rather than threshold-based — as it is at Wild Fortune, Oshi Casino and PlayAmo — then both the amount leaving and whether it leaves are governed by wording rather than by numbers you can predict. The discretionary clauses are set out under who reserves the right instead.

Five empty cells, and why they stay empty

Vave, DuckDice, Empire.io, Metaspins and Rainbet publish no cap we could read.

The tempting reading is no cap means no limit, and it is exactly backwards. An operator that has not published a ceiling has not committed to the absence of one either. There is simply no sentence about it in the document we read — nothing to rely on, nothing to quote, nothing to hold anyone to.

Silence never resolves in the operator's favour on this site, and it never resolves in the reader's favour either. It resolves as not published, which is the accurate statement of what happened when the document was opened.

Vave, whose row is the emptiest in the table, is the paid partner here. Its cap cell is blank for the same reason as its verification cell and its licence cell: there was no readable document. That row is the standing test of whether the empty-cell rule is real, and the answer has to be the same as it is for the other nine.

What to check in the clause itself

If a cap matters to you, three details inside the clause matter as much as the amount.

Whether the ceiling applies per transaction or cumulatively across the period, since those produce very different schedules for the same balance. Whether it is stated in the account's currency or in a fixed unit, which decides who carries the exchange movement. And whether the section that contains it also contains a separate rule for exceptionally large single wins, which some operators handle in their own paragraph rather than under the general cap.

The clause numbers on this page are there so the reading can be checked rather than believed. What counts as a readable source, and why nothing here is estimated, is set out under how the terms are read.